<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What makes good portfolio photos?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonsilver.co.uk/2009/01/19/what-makes-good-portfolio-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonsilver.co.uk/2009/01/19/what-makes-good-portfolio-photos/</link>
	<description>your life in pictures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.jonsilver.co.uk/2009/01/19/what-makes-good-portfolio-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonsilver.co.uk/2009/01/19/what-makes-good-portfolio-photos#comment-357</guid>
		<description>i give it 2 or 3 months before the history of this page is visible on the &quot;way back machine&quot; internet archive (http://web.archive.org). should end up visible here i guess: http://bit.ly/cdbZ3

in the mean time google&#039;s cached version shows the original comments: http://bit.ly/Dzjr6

at least in the states we have the 1st amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i give it 2 or 3 months before the history of this page is visible on the &#8220;way back machine&#8221; internet archive (<a href="http://web.archive.org" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org</a>). should end up visible here i guess: <a href="http://bit.ly/cdbZ3" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cdbZ3</a></p>
<p>in the mean time google&#8217;s cached version shows the original comments: <a href="http://bit.ly/Dzjr6" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Dzjr6</a></p>
<p>at least in the states we have the 1st amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.jonsilver.co.uk/2009/01/19/what-makes-good-portfolio-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonsilver.co.uk/2009/01/19/what-makes-good-portfolio-photos#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Having mentioned no names whatsoever in my article above, a chap called Mike Hannah, a director of the company which trades variously as Pure Space Studios, Blue Rooms Studios and Diesel Models has contacted me today by telephone, email and posted letter to ask me to remove two third-party comments which mentioned Diesel Models by name. The comments in question expressed feelings of disappointment and dismay at the service received by two former customers of Diesel Models, and those individuals&#039; opinions that the company was to be avoided. Mr Hannah&#039;s removal request was accompanied by assertions that the comments made by the third parties concerned were defamatory, and that I was responsible for that defamation as the comments appeared on my web site. Threats of further action, including words such as &quot;slander&quot; and &quot;legal action&quot;, were made by Mr Hannah in the event that I did not remove the comments. Mr Hannah claims to have been advised by litigation lawyers at Gillhams Solicitors.

I have therefore removed the two comments from public view.

Thought for the day: An itch, once scratched, can become a raging boil; it&#039;s sometimes better to just leave it alone.

Advice for would-be models: try a few Google searches first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having mentioned no names whatsoever in my article above, a chap called Mike Hannah, a director of the company which trades variously as Pure Space Studios, Blue Rooms Studios and Diesel Models has contacted me today by telephone, email and posted letter to ask me to remove two third-party comments which mentioned Diesel Models by name. The comments in question expressed feelings of disappointment and dismay at the service received by two former customers of Diesel Models, and those individuals&#8217; opinions that the company was to be avoided. Mr Hannah&#8217;s removal request was accompanied by assertions that the comments made by the third parties concerned were defamatory, and that I was responsible for that defamation as the comments appeared on my web site. Threats of further action, including words such as &#8220;slander&#8221; and &#8220;legal action&#8221;, were made by Mr Hannah in the event that I did not remove the comments. Mr Hannah claims to have been advised by litigation lawyers at Gillhams Solicitors.</p>
<p>I have therefore removed the two comments from public view.</p>
<p>Thought for the day: An itch, once scratched, can become a raging boil; it&#8217;s sometimes better to just leave it alone.</p>
<p>Advice for would-be models: try a few Google searches first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
